Duplicate data entry
The same candidate gets typed into a spreadsheet, then the CRM, sometimes twice. Every new source of applications adds more manual work.
Candidate data typed once, synced everywhere. Access you can actually audit. Built on n8n, live in 30 days.
Book a free 20-min automation auditThe problem
The same candidate gets typed into a spreadsheet, then the CRM, sometimes twice. Every new source of applications adds more manual work.
Nobody can say at a glance where a candidate stands. Status lives in someone's head or a Slack thread, not the system.
Permissions accumulate over years of hires and departures. Most agencies don't know who can see or edit what until something goes wrong.
What you get
01
n8n automations pull candidate data into your CRM the moment it arrives — no double typing, no missed applicants.
02
Automatic notifications keep recruiters and hiring managers updated as candidates move through the pipeline.
03
A full review of who can access what, with a prioritized report and fixes — not just a list of problems.
Pricing
$1,500
Know exactly what to automate first
$3,500–5,000
CRM sync, notifications and security, live in 30 days
from $800/mo
Your automation partner, ongoing
Where it breaks
Ask most staffing agency owners where their process breaks and they'll point at a tool. It's rarely the tool. It's the handoff between tools.
A candidate applies through a job board. That application needs to reach your ATS, and usually it does, because job boards ship with an integration for that. The break starts one step later. Someone reviews the application in the ATS, decides to move the candidate forward, and now has to recreate that candidate in the CRM to track outreach and placement — often by hand, copying name, phone number, and resume notes into a second system that has no idea the first one exists. Do that fifty times a week and typos creep in: a phone number off by one digit, an email copied from an old thread, a candidate entered twice because two recruiters worked the same lead without knowing it.
The next handoff is worse. Once a candidate is placed, payroll needs to know: start date, pay rate, client, assignment length. That information usually lives correctly in the CRM, because that's where the placement got closed. But payroll is a different system again, and by the time someone retypes the placement details into it, you're on the third manual transcription of the same facts. Every retype is a chance for the CRM and payroll to quietly disagree about what was actually agreed with the candidate.
This is why growth makes things worse, not better. At ten placements a month, a recruiter can hold the discrepancies in their head and catch them. At a hundred, nobody catches them until a candidate calls asking why their pay doesn't match what they were told, or a client asks why the invoice references someone who isn't actually on the assignment anymore.
None of this needs a new platform. It needs the handoffs automated: job board to ATS, ATS to CRM, CRM to payroll, each one moving the same record forward instead of recreating it. That's the actual fix, and it's usually smaller than agencies expect once someone maps where the retyping happens.
Case study
A recruiting firm had candidate data split across spreadsheets and the CRM, typed in more than once, with no clear picture of who could access what. We built n8n automations that sync applications automatically and ran a full CRM security audit.
Read the full case studyFAQ
I work with the CRMs and ATS platforms staffing agencies actually use, connected through n8n, Airtable, or direct API calls. If your CRM has an API or a webhook, I can connect it. During the audit call I check what your current system supports before committing to a build approach.
Candidate data moves between the systems you already use and control — I don't route it through a third-party database of my own. Access stays limited to what each workflow needs, and I document exactly what data flows where so you can answer a candidate's access request or a compliance check without guessing.
It works alongside it. Most agencies lose time in the handoff between the ATS and the CRM, not because either tool is bad, but because nothing keeps them in sync automatically. I build the automation that closes that gap rather than asking you to migrate systems.
I look at who has access to what, whether candidate data is duplicated across tools unnecessarily, where API keys and integrations are exposed, and whether automations you already have are quietly creating security gaps. You get a plain-language list of what's fine and what needs fixing.
I build matching logic based on the fields your process actually relies on, usually email and phone plus a fuzzy name match, and route likely duplicates for a quick human confirmation rather than auto-merging silently. You keep control over the merge; the automation just stops the duplicates from piling up unnoticed.
Because the workflows live in n8n rather than locked inside the CRM itself, I rebuild the connection points to the new system rather than starting from scratch. Your automation logic — how candidates get scored, routed, followed up — carries over. Only the plumbing to the new CRM needs rework.
Free audit call. No commitment. You leave with at least one automation you can build yourself.
Book your audit call